Pangloss
feu follet
Registered: Aug 2000
Location: 54.60°N 5.70°W
Posts: 1950 |
quote: Originally posted by Cage:
Oh, and it seems that the idea of "sport" has historically been derived from the simulation of life skills, such as foot races, archery, wrestling, etc. In that vein, it seems that one could make the case that sports that involve the inflicting of damage and attempts to physically overpower one's opponent make slightly more sense than ones that involve trying to put some irrelevant little ball past some other guys who can't really touch you, and into some irrelevant net.
On the other hand, one could argue that you are talking through your ass and in that vein, request that you go eat a dick.
To clarify, while many sports, particularly those with some 'history' have been dervived from the simultion of life skills, the objective in most cases is not the application of brute strength to beat one's opponent. Rather, the methodology encouraged in almost all of these cases is that of superior strategy and planning. In other words, it's a contest of minds and intelligence, and not of 'who's got the biggest muscles'. Boxing, wrestling etc. are obvious exceptions, but it may be argued that with two opponents of similar strength and size, it is intelligence and instinct which wins.
As for Americans being the sporting greats of the world, that is one hell of a comment to make. And one which you may be forced to eat when the states puts in yet another mediocre performance in the impending Olympic games in Sydney. Just because you have up to tenfold the population of any other country does not make you great. In comparison with the rest of the world, on a 'population for population' basis, you are actually quite weak.
------------------
I gave myself to sin, I gave myself to providence,
And I've been there and back again, the state that I am in ...
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|