T H E A S Y L U M
Administrator
Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 631 |
Regarding Philly and tack
As some of you know, there have been issues with recent statements made by tack regarding our meet in Philly. We want to make everyone aware of these comments, so at the very least you are informed.
On Monday morning (EST) in chat, tack got into an exchange with SmugGit and lunacy as follows:
10:07: tack> if you dont remember what im talking about, go to http://www.ambertrees.com/tackRules/ and see the picture you took, hehe
10:07: smugling> tack, be careful
10:07: tack> yes, one of the best tack rules pics ever
10:07: tack> be careful about what smugling
10:07: smugling> even if I don't kick you, the logs will get you in trouble
10:07: smugling> endless spamming!
10:07: smugling> do it in PM
10:07: tack> how will logs get me in trouble?
10:08: tack> mstrg hasn't even told me to stop, as soon as he asks me to i will
10:08: CRSR> i think thats harmless spam
10:08: smugling> because they will get checked and the number of times that you have spammed added up
10:08: tack> my spam isnt endless and its not harmless
10:08: tack> its not killing chat and its not flooding
10:08: lunacy> you are pushing it a bit tack
10:08: tack> er, it Is harmless
10:08: tack> hehe
10:08: tack> hey, lunacy, stfu
10:08: smugling> you have been doing it since I woke up!
10:08: CRSR> heh
10:08: tack> why don't you cry about it smugling??
10:08: Datura> http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/ http://www.standonguard.com/
10:08: Datura> spam?
10:08: CRSR> ha
10:08: smugling> I would say so
10:08: Datura> okay... im going to go have some grapefruit.. mmm 
10:08: Datura> i'll be back
10:09: Caffeine> Enjoy the fruit of grape
10:09: tack> see, theres spam.
10:09: lunacy> fine tack, do what you want, we're just trying to give you a head's up
10:09: CRSR> watch the game yesturday Dat
10:09: *** Datura is now known as dat-curling4loonies
10:09: CRSR> what a bad 3rd period
10:09: cada> i been here all night
10:09: tack> a heads up on what?
10:09: dat-curling4loonies> dont even talk to me about that.. fucking housemates.. i'll tell you wh en i get back.. let's say that i wasnt impressed.
10:09: dat-curling4loonies> 
10:09: dat-curling4loonies> xo
10:09: cada> doesn't seem excessive to me
10:09: smugling> in fact, i can't op myself at work anyway, you are safe from me
10:09: tack> lunacy, if you keep bothering me im going to spit on you in philly, theres my heads up to you.
10:09: lunacy> how the hell was i bothering you
10:09: smugling> I don't know, how many times can you paste the same site in a day?
10:10: tack> talking to me = bothring me.
10:10: tack> as many times as i want as long as its not in a row
10:10: smugling> I would say that over 15 in 6 hours would be irritating to the admins
10:10: lunacy> ah, that makes sense
10:10: lunacy> by all means, keep spamming, please
10:10: tack> lunacy, stfu or get spit on.
10:10: lunacy> i'll enjoy it when you get kicked
10:10: cada> smug....184,324
10:10: tack> wow, i'll get kicked and be back in less than a second later
10:11: lunacy> you spit on me and you'll need an xray to find your balls
10:11: smugling> tack, you will get kicked when someone with ops is in here, if you are like that (as you know)
10:11: tack> if you touch me lunacy i will literally slit your throat
10:11: smugling> kuglo has been banned now
10:11: tack> murder is legal in self defense in pennsylvania 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Later that day, tack was banned from #wota for 24 hours.
On Tuesday, someone messaged an admin to inform them that tack intends to kill MstrG and himself in Philly. This person claims they got this info directly from tack. While it might aid you in assessing the credulity of the statements, we won't reveal the person's name for obvious reasons. We also have strong reason to believe he has said it to more than one person.
You're free to make whatever judgements you like about how to react to "threats on the Internet". Given we are talking about a real life event here, we have to take this seriously. As a sage man said this morning, "it sucks that the world we live in removes the innocence of assuming that it is a joke and ploy for attention."
If anyone has factual information to provide regarding this, we'd very much like to hear it. Please contact any admin.
Last edited by T H E A S Y L U M on 02-21-2002 at 04:01 AM
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|