The Asylum Private Messages Options Search Blogs Images Chat Cam Portals Calendar FAQ's Join  
Asylum Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.8 Asylum Forums > The Lost Forum > George Orwell should have titled his book 2002...
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread [new thread]    [post reply]
urbanjunkie
23

Registered: Sep 2000
Location: Playa d'en London
Posts: 9826

George Orwell should have titled his book 2002...

this is probably old news, and knowing this place its probably been posted before. if so, my apologies for the repeat.


http://www.stoppoliceware.com/


-------------------

Copyright bill universally rejected

Reuters News Agency

Washington — A digital-copyright bill introduced in the U.S. Senate last month has inspired howls of protest from consumers and high-tech firms who say it could slow technological advances and dictate how consumers listen to music or watch videos at home.

Well connected lobbyists and everyday users alike have flooded Congress with faxes and e-mail over the past several weeks to lodge complaints against the bill, which would prevent new computers, CD players and other consumer-electronics devices from playing unauthorized movies, music and other digital media files.

Sen. Ernest Hollings' bill is backed by media firms such as The Walt Disney Co. These companies fear fast Internet connections and an array of digital devices such as MP3 players and CD burners will encourage consumers to seek free copies of hit singles and new movies.

The South Carolina Democrat has said he introduced the bill to encourage media and technology firms to work together to stop digital piracy.

Instead, it has inspired a flurry of criticism.

A grass-roots group called DigitalConsumer.org, which did not exist a month ago, claims to have signed up 24,000 members who have sent off 80,000 faxes to their elected representatives.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, which has also held hearings on the issue, has received more than 3,500 comments criticizing the bill, a spokeswoman said.

"We haven't received one e-mail in support of the Hollings bill," said Judiciary Committee spokeswoman Mimi Devlin. "It seems like there's a groundswell of support from regular users."

High-tech lobbying groups have weighed in as well, arguing that mandatory copyright-protection technologies would hurt their ability to innovate, and would encourage consumers to hold on to their older computers rather than buy new models that restricted their activities.

In testimony before Sen. Hollings' Commerce and Science Committee last month, Disney Chairman and CEO Michael Eisner accused technology firms such as Intel Corp. of profiting from digital piracy, and said they were not interested in working out a way to stop the problem.

Technology firms did not want to testify in the hearing, did not offer input while the bill was being drafted, and have offered plenty of criticism but little helpful suggestions since, a Hollings aide said.

"They seem satisfied to try to attack it in the press rather than trying to make it work," said Sen. Hollings spokesman Andy Davis.

Joe Krauss, head of the grassroots group DigitalConsumer.org, said his members have offered plenty of constructive suggestions.

For example, the group has called for a law that would specifically spell out consumers' "fair use" rights, such as the right to record TV shows for later viewing, or transfer a CD to a portable MP3 player.

"Until you have a positive assertion of what consumers' rights are, that debate is left in the hands of media companies' lawyers," said Mr. Krauss, who founded Excite, the now-defunct on-line portal.

Media firms could also take a page from the antipiracy playbook of software companies, who concentrate on shutting down large, commercial piracy operations rather than trying to control individual users, he said.

The Hollings bill also faces opposition from Vermont Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy, whose Judiciary Committee handles copyright issues.

While the Commerce Committee has primary control over the bill, it will be difficult to pass without the co-operation of Sen. Leahy and other Judiciary Committee members, staffers from both committees said.

-------------------



Great isn’t it, the way the Government wants to regulate every part of our lives (well, at least in America).

the industry needs to start working on the basis that mp3's and file-sharing in general exist from this point onwards and is not something that can be brushed under the carpet.

they need to try to make the best out of it. Its a different kind of business at this present time. so enough with chipping away at our liberties. unless they also plan to throw people into prison in aid of a new national past time. so fight the power and stuff.



lobster in the pot, indeed..........

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-03-2002 08:59 PM
urbanjunkie is offline Click Here to See the Profile for urbanjunkie Click here to Send urbanjunkie a Private Message Visit urbanjunkie's homepage! Find more posts by urbanjunkie Add urbanjunkie to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
karen
aging hipster

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: seattle-ish
Posts: 11410

FmsS::

i see mickey mouse as the governments puppetmaster telling them to goose step over our right to rip off disney.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-04-2002 02:26 AM
karen is offline Click Here to See the Profile for karen Click here to Send karen a Private Message Find more posts by karen Add karen to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:38 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - The Asylum >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © 2000- Imaginet Inc.
[Legal Notice] | [Privacy Policy] | [Site Index]