Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 7236

The debate seen by one from the other side of the water

I only watched part of the debate myself the oter night. I feel asleep coz it was too late for me. Anyways, heres some analysis from Andrew Gumbel in LA for the quality press. (i.e not the Tabloids)

'If Al Gore and George W Bush seemed to spend more time reciting chunks of their campaign stump speeches than they did actually debating on Tuesday night, that was largely the fault of television.

Television, that great low common denominator the screenwriter Paddy Chayevsky once defined as the "common rubble of banality", offered the candidates their biggest audience of the campaign so far –75 million people – and neither man seemed inclined to stray far from the well-rehearsed, well-practised lines they had each used many times before.

Sure, Mr Gore had already declared himself to be "his own man" and promised "never to let the American people down" during his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in August, but that commanded a television audience of just 20 million.

Likewise, Mr Bush's lines about being for the people rather than for government, were so old they induced a state of narcolepsy in the CBS anchor Dan Rather, but might just have reached some less assiduous political observers in their armchairs at home.

The lack of adventurousness perhaps explains why the flurry of post-debate polls showed much the same as every other poll: that Mr Gore is ahead on the issues and Mr Bush strikes voters as considerably less unimpressive than they might have thought. Unscientific random samplings by NBC and CBS declared Mr Gore the winner by a comfortable margin, while a similar poll for ABC put them almost level. Perhaps the most significant poll, conducted by Gallup for CNN and USA Today, showed Mr Gore doing better (48 per cent to 41 per cent) but showed Mr Bush convincing a sizeable chunk of voters that he was, after all, up to the challenges of the presidency (34 per cent of respondents said their image of him improved, against 14 per cent who said it got worse).

Also significant, however, was the fact only 3 per cent said the debate had changed their minds.

Initial impressions suggested that attention on the televised debate was hardly rapt. In California, evidence gathered from restaurants and bars suggested viewers cocked half an ear at the screen at best. Reports in newspapers across the country had voters popping to the kitchen for beers and making phone calls. NBC did not carry the debate at all, opting instead for a baseball game.

"I'm yet to hear anything to get me excited about either of these candidates," was a representative comment from an undecided Californian voter.

Tuesday night was nevertheless the best shot Mr Gore and Mr Bush will have. Their next debate, in North Carolina on Wednesday, is expected to draw a far lower television audience, as is today's vice-presidential stand-off between Joe Lieberman and Dick Cheney.'

So there we have it. Its an open race still and I hope you all get what you want from it


------------------
sp00ky
---------------------------
'Paranoia, schizophrenic, full-up panic, head clinic, no asylum, equals violence, sucides are rising.' Lee Kenny

[This message has been edited by Spooky (edited 10-05-2000).]

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 862

using a sampling of people in california isn't really representative of anything. the damn debates started at 6pm here, i'm sure more than half the people who live in LA were on the freeways in front of me!

it's a stupid thing that whole live tv nonsense...on one side you have a great starting time for the east coast (9pm) and an extremely shitty one for the west, but if you start it late enough for the west coast to have enough time to get home, then 90% of the east coasters are sleeping (as if they weren't by mid debate anyway)...

bah...i'm just babbling anyway..being stuck at work sucks =(

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 7236

i guess you know more about this stuff than me coz I don;t live there, I just wanted people too see how it was being reported here where no particular agenda is desired by the papers as such

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged