The Asylum Private Messages Options Search Blogs Images Chat Cam Portals Calendar FAQ's Join  
Asylum Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.8 Asylum Forums > Políticás der Monde > In Defense of Defense
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread [new thread]    [post reply]
oxsan
Keeper of the Keys

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Rio de los Brazos de Dios
Posts: 3876

In Defense of Defense

In driving home from a medical appointment in Ft Worth today I listened to a local radio talk show type (Mark Davis) that featured
a give and take interview with several Russian University students who are in Dallas for some reason not known to me. They were very articulate , spoke flawless English and were very diverse in the group concerning their views on the US coming hassle with Iraq. They were also very candid. The following quotes may not be exact so accept them as paraphases. I list this because Davis' answer is one of those things I hear that I wish I had said:

Russian---Why is it that you American get so 8upset when the French disagree with you?

Davis--We don't. Americans are masters of disagreement even among ourselves and welcome it as the presentation of a different view for discussion, but I think Europeans fail to grasp the fact that Americans are very passionate about their own defense and very reluctant to commit any part of its implementation to a foreign power. In matters of defending our family, our country, and ourselves we do not want to have to depend on anyone or deviate from our own plans for anyone.
Byut even there we don't mind your disagreement and your criticism but heaven help those who interfere with our self-defense. What possible laudable purpose could France acheive by
keeping us from defending ourselves from Saddam Hussein.We do not ask France to be involved nor to donate to the cost in either lives or money. All we ask is that they get out of our way."

The Russian group was about equally divided in assessing this statement by Davis concerning the French.

I noticed that gasoline prices dropped six cents since I filled up yesterday. From 1.54 to 1.48 per US gallon. The Californians are going to be claiming that there is a vast Texas gasoline conspiracy
because they are paying 2.04 per US gallon. Due to a little thing called State tax. Prices are for regukar. Can you use regular in a Porsche.?
ah well.

__________________
oxsan


Don't kick until yer spurred.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 05:39 PM
oxsan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for oxsan Click here to Send oxsan a Private Message Visit oxsan's homepage! Find more posts by oxsan Add oxsan to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Smug Git
Arrogance Personified

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 35656

quote:
...but I think Europeans fail to grasp the fact that Americans are very passionate about their own defense and very reluctant to commit any part of its implementation to a foreign power.


He can't really believe that. I mean, maybe some very stupid Europeans don't understand it, sure, but not the average European. Especially the first bit '...Europeans fail to grasp the fact that Americans are very passionate about their own defense...'. Weird. What he says does illustrate the differences, but I would say that he has misunderstood some of the 'European' position, in that some of the 'Europeans' feel that the US is not under threat from Saddam Hussein and therefore is not acting to protect itself from him. Without saying which side is right, I think that is much closer to the difference of opinion; it is a difference of opinion about the risk that Saddam poses in the short term (say, up till Autumn) rather than them thinking that the US owes it to everyone else, in some bizarre way, to not defend itself. Only a moron could really think that, and if Mr Davis thinks that is really what the French think, say, then he must think them morons (which judgement I would say is in significantly in error). Ascribing idiotic beliefs to people who disagree with you is hardly unique to him, or americans, of course, everyone is at it (you even see it in this very forum from time to time). But it isn't constructive, it just massages ones own prejudices and avoids the difficult questions.

__________________
I want to live and I want to love
I want to catch something that I might be ashamed of

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 05:55 PM
Smug Git is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Smug Git Click here to Send Smug Git a Private Message Find more posts by Smug Git Add Smug Git to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
oxsan
Keeper of the Keys

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Rio de los Brazos de Dios
Posts: 3876

Smug, I won't pretend to be an expert on European Public Opinion but I will tell you that I think that Davis put his finger right in the heart of a big difference between Americans and Europeans. Americans inately distrust international agreements. Americans do not believe thjat any other country or bloc of countries can be or should be as concerned about Americas relationship with Iraq as America is. I am not arguing that it is good or bad but I am saying that it is that way. Many European countries (Belgium, Netherlands, Spain, Portuga, Hungary, Denmark to name a few) simply do not have the capability to defend themselves in this modern world. I think that it is very natural for them to think in terms of collectively defending themselves. An American thinks, whether it is true or not that he is safer when he depends on the US unimpeded by the will of others to defend him. Most of us believe that the US in this World
can defend itself against any nation or combination of nations arrayed against it. That is not bravado nor arrogance. We have chosen to sink a significant portion of our national wealth into defense related programs in order to retain the independence I outline aabove. Nearly all of the European countries--other than the "new Europeanj countries" have chosen to invest their natuional wealth in social programs and neglected their defense establishment and publicly stated that it was their purpose to do so. In fact it has caused a certain segment of our own population
to point to Europe and say "We should do that. We should invest more money in our people and our environment and coincentrate on being friends with the world then we won't need a defense apparatus"

I am happy, for onbe, that this view did not prevail any more than it did. If the world were full of harmless old peanut farmers then
that might be all right, but it is not. As the WTC attack proved, as Saddam's 6000 liters of anthrax proves, as Kim Jon Il's supposed two nukes prove we still need to be able to defend ourselves all alone.

We cherish allies, especially UK. But we don't want to be put in the position of needing them---like we need Turkey to see things our way right now. Turkey is a staunch ally Very few people know just how staunch an ally Turkey was in the cold war days even when they were right under the Russian guns. I am glad that even if the new Prime Minister can't turn the Turkish pParliament around in a hurry that the result will be merely bother and not utter defeat.

I am sorry that Denmark, Belgium, Spain can't have that sense of self assurance and must depend on others to help them against a common foe but they didn't concentrate on it for fifty cold war years and we did.

I think Davis had it pretty well pegged. So did some of his Russian visitors.

__________________
oxsan


Don't kick until yer spurred.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 07:33 PM
oxsan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for oxsan Click here to Send oxsan a Private Message Visit oxsan's homepage! Find more posts by oxsan Add oxsan to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Smug Git
Arrogance Personified

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 35656

Those countries that you mentioned aren't really able to defend themselves unless we help them, sure; they would be stupid to expect it under all circumstances, though, obviously.

I personally think that Davis has precisely missed the point by not appreciating European reservations and attributing them to an attitude that isn't widely held. The absoutely fundamental difference is that some countries think that the US is mistaken or dissembling when it says that Iraq poses an immediate threat to its national security, and that is why some Europeans aren't keen on immediate military action against Iraq. And it is entirely reasonable, given that predicate, that they would oppose the proposed military action. It would be great if it was a 'us good, them bad' situation, but it isn't as far as I can see (and believe me, I have no reason to be nice about our European neighbours but fair's fair).

__________________
I want to live and I want to love
I want to catch something that I might be ashamed of

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 07:48 PM
Smug Git is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Smug Git Click here to Send Smug Git a Private Message Find more posts by Smug Git Add Smug Git to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
funkyrooster
King Leer

Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Just to the right of the moon
Posts: 3141

Bit unfair to have a go at Belgium, I thought. Not exactly in a prime position to defend itself, is it. OK for you guys. Handy having 3500 miles water to one side, 7000 miles to the other and the awesome military threat of Mexico lurking beneath.
As a Belgian, Weaselspoor would be mightily upset by your derogatory comments of this fine, upstanding and alcoholic little country.

__________________
Ein Reich
Ein Volk
Ein Rooster

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 08:26 PM
funkyrooster is offline Click Here to See the Profile for funkyrooster Click here to Send funkyrooster a Private Message Find more posts by funkyrooster Add funkyrooster to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Mugtoe
Cuddly Puppy

Registered: Oct 2001
Location:
Posts: 18136

Tell WeaselSpoor to answer his PMs, Rooster. I need to know when your festival is and when you guys are going to be in Madrid, so I can buy tickets with assurance.

Ok. As you were.

__________________

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 09:45 PM
Mugtoe is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Mugtoe Click here to Send Mugtoe a Private Message Find more posts by Mugtoe Add Mugtoe to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
funkyrooster
King Leer

Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Just to the right of the moon
Posts: 3141

Weaselspoor is in switzerland. I can give you his email if you want

__________________
Ein Reich
Ein Volk
Ein Rooster

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 09:59 PM
funkyrooster is offline Click Here to See the Profile for funkyrooster Click here to Send funkyrooster a Private Message Find more posts by funkyrooster Add funkyrooster to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
oxsan
Keeper of the Keys

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Rio de los Brazos de Dios
Posts: 3876

I didn't say anything bad about Belgium. All I said was that they were incapable of defending themselves from all comers and were thus inclined to think in terms of collective3 defense whereas the US does have the capability to defend itself and thus thinks in terms of self defense and none of you guys have said anything to make me think otherwise. You reinforce my argument Smug. You say that the European Countries are not convinced of the immediacy and extent of the danger to US interests that Iraq imposes and what Mark Davis and I are telling you is that we don't think that it should be up to the European assessment of the danger of our position . We--we happy few--we band of brothers will decide when we are in danger it is not Europe and Africa to decide. We want no permanent presence in
Iraq---we do care what form of government is instituted there and that it is a stable sort of government that does not overly restrict its citizens with torture and death. And yes the Belgians do make the world's best beer. They must fortify it.

It is becoming appallingly apparent to the average American that
Jacque Chirac's main aim out of all of this is to bolster France's position in the EU and vs Nato and to detract from the stature and power of American influence in the world----and to maintain the lucrative economic pursuits French companies have with Iraq.

I will have to say that I think Mr Davis' analysis is right on the mark--and I have heard it on the radio all day as I toddled around my business.

__________________
oxsan


Don't kick until yer spurred.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-12-2003 10:17 PM
oxsan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for oxsan Click here to Send oxsan a Private Message Visit oxsan's homepage! Find more posts by oxsan Add oxsan to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Smug Git
Arrogance Personified

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 35656

quote:
Originally posted by oxsan
You reinforce my argument Smug. You say that the European Countries are not convinced of the immediacy and extent of the danger to US interests that Iraq imposes and what Mark Davis and I are telling you is that we don't think that it should be up to the European assessment of the danger of our position .


No no no, that is precisely what I am not doing. The 'European attitude' is that the US is wrong, not that the US should be subject to European direction. That is where Mr Davis, in my opinion, misunderstands what this whole thing is about. The UN is simply a place to build consensus and the idea amongst some of the US population that the UN can make the US do things any more than diplomatic horsetrading has ever made a country do things is also wrong. It is just there in the open in the UN, which is what the UN was designed to do; countries still do what they want in the end, if they are prepared to pay the price, same as they have done since countries existed. If you ask me to support you, and I say 'no', that is not me telling you that you can't do what you want to do, is it? Even if I tell you that I'll put my own armies in your way, in fact (and no one is saying that) then you can still do it if you are prepared to pay that price. The UN offers a way to achieve international support that was not available before; it doesn't offer a way to stop the US from pursuing their own interests. It seems to me that the problem is more that those US people who say that they don't care what the rest of the world thing about them are in fact the ones who do care about what other nations think about them, because the downside of the UN is that it can allow condemnation with (nearly) one voice; there isn't any power to enforce behaviour on the US any more than there would be through the normal diplomatic channels before the UN. I can't understand their concern in any other way, in fact, because on the surface they appear to be ascribing, to the UN, powers that it lacks. The UN forms an open meeting place, which is a pretty good thing, and now that nuclear weapons are in the military and diplomatic equation, it seems eminently sensible to have an open discussion forum of this nature. In that discussion forum, if people disagree, they will say so; this is patently not the same as them taking responsibility for US defence, or taking control of US security issues.

The idea that any country likes entrusting its protection to other nations and that a lack of this enthusiasm for the protection of others somehow sets America apart is surely absurd; just because other countries may have to (as, realistically, all but a handful of countries will have to) does not imply any great enthusiasm for it (recognising necessity, after all, is generally a sensible thing to do). And let us not forget that Belgium gave the world 'freedom fries'.

__________________
I want to live and I want to love
I want to catch something that I might be ashamed of

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-13-2003 06:33 AM
Smug Git is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Smug Git Click here to Send Smug Git a Private Message Find more posts by Smug Git Add Smug Git to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Smug Git
Arrogance Personified

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 35656

I ought to add, though, that I am not talking about the French 'man on the street', who, I suspect, is as ill-informed, opiniated and ignorant as men on streets in our own countries. I was thinking about the general position of the leaders, who are not stupid or ignorant nor manifestly evil, and also about people who have taken time to think through the whole thing. The average 'man in the street' in London here will not have spent a great deal of time considering things carefully even if he has spent a long time discussing it in the pub. And I don't divorce myself from that failing either; in any event, we are always the worst people to judge ourselves. I am probably as bad as any of them and just don't know it.

__________________
I want to live and I want to love
I want to catch something that I might be ashamed of

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-13-2003 09:28 AM
Smug Git is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Smug Git Click here to Send Smug Git a Private Message Find more posts by Smug Git Add Smug Git to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
oxsan
Keeper of the Keys

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Rio de los Brazos de Dios
Posts: 3876

Smug, part of the "arrogance" which Europeans ascribe to Americans is wrapped up in the fact that we are proud to be Americans and can't picture ourselves as anything else. We are a bit like the Pharisee in the Bible who prayed in the Temple "Thank God I was born a man." I would agree with the feminists who find that offensive. I also can understand that some foreigners see us in the same role as that Pharisee when we pray (albeit at the altar of commerce) "Thank God I was born an American".

__________________
oxsan


Don't kick until yer spurred.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-13-2003 03:07 PM
oxsan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for oxsan Click here to Send oxsan a Private Message Visit oxsan's homepage! Find more posts by oxsan Add oxsan to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
funkyrooster
King Leer

Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Just to the right of the moon
Posts: 3141

On the subject of facing new and unexpected threats, I walked out of a lecture by the Senior Counsel at the Russian embassy ( top spook) on Russian attitudes to European security structures, and was hit in the chops by a paper aeroplane launched at me by a German Major-General who, I might add, should have known better as he nearly had my eye out.

__________________
Ein Reich
Ein Volk
Ein Rooster

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-13-2003 04:11 PM
funkyrooster is offline Click Here to See the Profile for funkyrooster Click here to Send funkyrooster a Private Message Find more posts by funkyrooster Add funkyrooster to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
skalie
the honourable

Registered: Sep 2001
Location: ........
Posts: 15003

quote:
originally posted by oxsan
In fact it has caused a certain segment of our own population to point to Europe and say "We should do that. We should invest more money in our people and our environment and coincentrate on being friends with the world then we won't need a defense apparatus"

I am happy, for one, that this view did not prevail any more than it did. If the world were full of harmless old peanut farmers then that might be all right, but it is not. As the WTC attack proved, as Saddam's 6000 liters of anthrax proves, as Kim Jon Il's supposed two nukes prove we still need to be able to defend ourselves all alone.



What if, and it is a big if, the "We should do that. We should invest more money in our people and our environment and coincentrate on being friends with the world then we won't need a defense apparatus" crowd had prevailed?

Would 911 have happened? Would Saddam have 6000 litres of Anthrax?

Seems to me that there isn't really too much to defend Stateside now the cold war is over, the defense budjet seems to be used to arm other nations.

Saw a documentary about friendly fire the other night on the box, one of the major problems these days, it appears, is that both sides are using the same equipment.

The only winner seems to be the manufacturers of the armaments, certainly not the people or the environment.

This Saddam threat that the US is racing off to defend itself against, why isn't there full support coming from the Arab nations, surely they would be the first one's to be worried about getting attacked?

quote:

It is becoming appallingly apparent to the average American that
Jacque Chirac's main aim out of all of this is to bolster France's position in the EU and vs Nato and to detract from the stature and power of American influence in the world----and to maintain the lucrative economic pursuits French companies have with Iraq.



Or alternatively he wants to win the Nobel Peace prize.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-13-2003 04:44 PM
skalie is offline Click Here to See the Profile for skalie Click here to Send skalie a Private Message Find more posts by skalie Add skalie to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mmmtravis
T-Raz w/ the freaky freak

Registered: May 2002
Location:
Posts: 8820

quote:
Originally posted by oxsan
Smug, part of the "arrogance" which Europeans ascribe to Americans is wrapped up in the fact that we are proud to be Americans and can't picture ourselves as anything else. We are a bit like the Pharisee in the Bible who prayed in the Temple "Thank God I was born a man." I would agree with the feminists who find that offensive. I also can understand that some foreigners see us in the same role as that Pharisee when we pray (albeit at the altar of commerce) "Thank God I was born an American".


Hey boy-o, speak for yourself. While I'm delighted to have not been born a Senegalese dung beetle, I would disagree with the generalised assesment you made of the American populus. Yeah, I even try to spell all Euro-Englishy, so put that in your thesis and smoke it.

__________________
Fuck the Red Sox. Fuck the Patriots. Fuck the Celtics. Fuck Vegas. Fuck You. Fuck Boston.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-13-2003 04:46 PM
mmmtravis is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mmmtravis Click here to Send mmmtravis a Private Message Visit mmmtravis's homepage! Find more posts by mmmtravis Add mmmtravis to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
oxsan
Keeper of the Keys

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Rio de los Brazos de Dios
Posts: 3876

mmmsivart, perhaps in about another fifty years when you have studied the American character for the same number of years that I have you will agree with the conclusions I have offered in this thread. If not don't expect to look me up to gloat, I'll probably not be around. And I was speaking for myself as I always do.

__________________
oxsan


Don't kick until yer spurred.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-13-2003 06:08 PM
oxsan is offline Click Here to See the Profile for oxsan Click here to Send oxsan a Private Message Visit oxsan's homepage! Find more posts by oxsan Add oxsan to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:58 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - The Asylum >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © 2000- Imaginet Inc.
[Legal Notice] | [Privacy Policy] | [Site Index]