Smug Git
Arrogance Personified
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 35656 |
quote: Originally posted by oxsan
You reinforce my argument Smug. You say that the European Countries are not convinced of the immediacy and extent of the danger to US interests that Iraq imposes and what Mark Davis and I are telling you is that we don't think that it should be up to the European assessment of the danger of our position .
No no no, that is precisely what I am not doing. The 'European attitude' is that the US is wrong, not that the US should be subject to European direction. That is where Mr Davis, in my opinion, misunderstands what this whole thing is about. The UN is simply a place to build consensus and the idea amongst some of the US population that the UN can make the US do things any more than diplomatic horsetrading has ever made a country do things is also wrong. It is just there in the open in the UN, which is what the UN was designed to do; countries still do what they want in the end, if they are prepared to pay the price, same as they have done since countries existed. If you ask me to support you, and I say 'no', that is not me telling you that you can't do what you want to do, is it? Even if I tell you that I'll put my own armies in your way, in fact (and no one is saying that) then you can still do it if you are prepared to pay that price. The UN offers a way to achieve international support that was not available before; it doesn't offer a way to stop the US from pursuing their own interests. It seems to me that the problem is more that those US people who say that they don't care what the rest of the world thing about them are in fact the ones who do care about what other nations think about them, because the downside of the UN is that it can allow condemnation with (nearly) one voice; there isn't any power to enforce behaviour on the US any more than there would be through the normal diplomatic channels before the UN. I can't understand their concern in any other way, in fact, because on the surface they appear to be ascribing, to the UN, powers that it lacks. The UN forms an open meeting place, which is a pretty good thing, and now that nuclear weapons are in the military and diplomatic equation, it seems eminently sensible to have an open discussion forum of this nature. In that discussion forum, if people disagree, they will say so; this is patently not the same as them taking responsibility for US defence, or taking control of US security issues.
The idea that any country likes entrusting its protection to other nations and that a lack of this enthusiasm for the protection of others somehow sets America apart is surely absurd; just because other countries may have to (as, realistically, all but a handful of countries will have to) does not imply any great enthusiasm for it (recognising necessity, after all, is generally a sensible thing to do). And let us not forget that Belgium gave the world 'freedom fries'.
__________________
I want to live and I want to love
I want to catch something that I might be ashamed of
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|