Paint CHiPs
Viva Le Me
Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Location Location
Posts: 26420 |
Peacekeeping, Inc
Violence breaks out in a small African state. The local government collapses and reports emerge that civilians are being massacred by the tens of thousands. Refugees stream out in pitiable columns. As scenes reminiscent of the Rwanda genocide are played out on the world's television screens once again, pressure mounts to do something. The U.N.'s calls for action fall on deaf ears. In the U.S., the leadership remains busy with the war on terrorism and Iraq and decides that the political risks of doing nothing are far lower than the risks of losing any American soldiers' lives in what is essentially a mission of charity. Other nations follow its lead, and none are willing to risk their own troops. As the international community dithers, innocent men, women, and children die by the hour.
It is at this point that a private company steps forward with a novel offer. Using its own hired troops, the firm will establish protected safe havens where civilians can take refuge and receive assistance from international aid agencies. Thousands of lives might be saved. All the company asks is a check for $150 million.
An interesting report from the Brookings Institute on the notion of privatizing military forces. Mercenaries, if you like. They've been playing a bigger role in international crisises in the last decade, and it's become a real growth industry worldwide.
The question isn't "is it a good idea", but rather, "how good an idea IS it?" It's already in use, current peacekeeping institutions are already proving themselves to be pretty inadequate in addressing some of the worst hotspots on earth (but not strategic hotspots), so, the idea is, what if we just start writing checks and letting mercs deal with the shit on the ground?
Read it. Interesting article.
http://www.brookings.edu/views/arti...ger20030601.htm
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|