The Asylum   Search Private Messages Options Blogs Images Chat Cam Portals Calendar FAQ's Join  
Asylum Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.8 Asylum Forums > Políticás der Monde > 'Smart Gun' Technology Getting Closer, added bonus of people tracking.
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread [new thread]    [post reply]
zim
-

Registered: Dec 2002
Location:
Posts: 3063

'Smart Gun' Technology Getting Closer, added bonus of people tracking.

quote:
yahoo news
By JILL BARTON, AP Business Writer

PALM BEACH, Fla. - A new computer chip promises to keep police guns from firing if they fall into the wrong hands.


The tiny chip would be implanted in a police officer's hand and would match up with a scanning device inside a handgun. If the officer and gun match, a digital signal unlocks the trigger so it can be fired. But if a child or criminal would get hold of the gun, it would be useless.

The technology is the latest attempt to create a so-called "smart gun" and could be marketed to law enforcement agencies within a year, according to Verichip Corp., which has created the microchip.

Verichip president Keith Bolton said that the technology could also improve safety for the military and individual gun owners.

"If you let your mind wander to other potential uses, you can imagine the lives that could be saved," he said.

Verichip, which has marketed similar microchips for security and medical purposes, announced Tuesday a partnership with gun maker FN Manufacturing to produce the smart weapons. The companies have developed a prototype and are working to refine its accuracy, Bolton said.

Similar developments are underway at other gun manufacturers and research firms. The New Jersey Institute of Technology and Australian gun maker Metal Storm Ltd. are working on a prototype smart gun that would recognize its owner's individual grip.

"We're at an interesting age where all sorts of science fiction is becoming real technology," said Donald Sebastian, NJIT vice president for research and development and director of the project.

The technology could also eventually have an even bigger impact on the illegal gun trade, Sebastian said.

The FBI (news - web sites) estimated that 67 percent of the 16,204 murders in 2002 were committed with firearms.

"You have a long-term benefit of making it much more difficult for a handgun to have any value to anyone other than the original owner," Sebastian said.

But until the smart-gun technology is repeatedly proved to be reliable, some law enforcement authorities remain leery.

The scanning device could malfunction, the officer's hand with the computer chip could be smashed during a fight or an officer might need to use a partner's gun, West Palm Beach police training Sgt. William Sandman said.

"We have power outages, computers crash. Would you risk your life knowing all those things that could go wrong?" Sandman said.

Verichip's Bolton said those concerns already are being addressed. He said the guns can be designed to work for an officer, his partner and a supervisor. Departments could set routines where the scanning devices in guns could be checked before every shift.

The chip needs no battery or power source. It works much like those that have been implanted in pets over the past decade so they can be identified if they get lost. Verichip, a subsidiary of the Palm Beach-based technology firm Applied Digital Solutions, developed a "more intelligent" version two years ago for humans and estimates that about 900 people worldwide have been implanted with them.

The chips can be used instead of security key cards at office buildings or to use global positioning satellites to keep track of a relative who might suffer from Alzheimer's. It can store medical information that emergency rooms could read or financial and identification information to prevent fraud.



The chip, about the size of a grain of rice, is inserted into an arm or hand with a syringe — much like a shot is given.

Bolton said the company has seen no medical complications and that the technology will only improve with time.

Once the technology is accepted, legislation could follow to encourage the use of smart guns. New Jersey already has passed legislation that will require smart gun technology on all handguns sold — three years after the state attorney general certifies that smart guns are available in the marketplace.

The National Rifle Association opposes the legislation because of potential problems with smart-gun technology, but gun safety advocates argue that the technology could encourage gun ownership with the newfound sense of security.

"It seems that guns are the only product that haven't followed a path of development that leads to greater safety for the user. The only real change we've seen is to make them more lethal and smaller so they can be more easily concealed," said Rob Wilcox, a spokesman for the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence. "This is one of the steps that hasn't been taken and we think this debate is one that needs to take place."

HOLY FUCKING SHIT. This is a possible implementation of smart gun technology that could be required in all handguns sold in the state of New Jersey? To exercise my constitutional right to keep and bear arms, I could be forced to have a tracking chip embedded in my arm which can be used by GPS systems to track my every move?

If this happens, I will not be living in Jersey anymore. Job or no job.

__________________
insert witty remark

Last edited by CHiPsJr on 11-09-2006 at 08:23 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 12:22 AM
zim is offline Click Here to See the Profile for zim Click here to Send zim a Private Message Find more posts by zim Add zim to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Trenchant_Troll
ad hominid

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 25010

Neato, but that's nothing. Check this out. Can you say, "phaser"?

http://www.defensereview.com/module...article&sid=304

__________________
I wanna be a part of the problem for a change.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 12:51 AM
Trenchant_Troll is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Trenchant_Troll Click here to Send Trenchant_Troll a Private Message Find more posts by Trenchant_Troll Add Trenchant_Troll to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mudded
Too drunk to fish

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: is futile
Posts: 5029

laser is banned from the battlefield, I believe...

carry on

__________________
Sticks and stones may break my bones... - But whips and chains excite me.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 01:02 AM
mudded is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mudded Click here to Send mudded a Private Message Visit mudded's homepage! Find more posts by mudded Add mudded to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Trenchant_Troll
ad hominid

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 25010

I believe this is more related to 'particle beam' technology, mudded, as opposed to a conventional laser, but I am by no means an authority on this. Perhaps our resident physicist will weigh in. At any rate, I doubt that anything is really banned from the battlefield if necessity demands it.

__________________
I wanna be a part of the problem for a change.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 01:24 AM
Trenchant_Troll is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Trenchant_Troll Click here to Send Trenchant_Troll a Private Message Find more posts by Trenchant_Troll Add Trenchant_Troll to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mudded
Too drunk to fish

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: is futile
Posts: 5029

quote:
Originally posted by Trenchant_Troll
At any rate, I doubt that anything is really banned from the battlefield if necessity demands it.


soo, Sarin and mustard gasses, as well as anthrax, smallpox and Y.pestis munitions are welcome additions to the arsenal of all armies then.

fancy that

__________________
Sticks and stones may break my bones... - But whips and chains excite me.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 03:29 AM
mudded is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mudded Click here to Send mudded a Private Message Visit mudded's homepage! Find more posts by mudded Add mudded to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Trenchant_Troll
ad hominid

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 25010

Welcome? No. Would they be used if the tide of war was against those having them? What do you think?

__________________
I wanna be a part of the problem for a change.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 03:32 AM
Trenchant_Troll is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Trenchant_Troll Click here to Send Trenchant_Troll a Private Message Find more posts by Trenchant_Troll Add Trenchant_Troll to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
mudded
Too drunk to fish

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: is futile
Posts: 5029

That may happen sometimes. But our recent Iraq invasion seems to be a counterexample.

- assuming of course that Mr. Hussein had such munitions at his disposal.

__________________
Sticks and stones may break my bones... - But whips and chains excite me.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 03:43 AM
mudded is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mudded Click here to Send mudded a Private Message Visit mudded's homepage! Find more posts by mudded Add mudded to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Smug Git
Arrogance Personified

Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Hilbert Space
Posts: 35736

quote:
Originally posted by Trenchant_Troll
I believe this is more related to 'particle beam' technology, mudded, as opposed to a conventional laser, but I am by no means an authority on this. Perhaps our resident physicist will weigh in. At any rate, I doubt that anything is really banned from the battlefield if necessity demands it.


Rather dubious about the use of the phrase 'photonic energy', but the implicaton was that it is a laser. It is normal enough to produce laser light from a gas; I don't know what the relevance of it being 'hypersonic' is, though.

I also heard that all nations had agreed not to use laser weapons; if one country broke that agreement because they had made a workable laser weapon, I don't think that it would necessarily be that hard for other countries to produce them too, to be honest. Germany has excellent lasers research, for example.

__________________
I want to live and I want to love
I want to catch something that I might be ashamed of

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-15-2004 07:38 AM
Smug Git is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Smug Git Click here to Send Smug Git a Private Message Find more posts by Smug Git Add Smug Git to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:48 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread

Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 

< Contact Us - The Asylum >

Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2002, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
Copyright © 2000- Imaginet Inc.
[Legal Notice] | [Privacy Policy] | [Site Index]