zim
-
Registered: Dec 2002
Location:
Posts: 3063 |
G, I'm a bit confused though. You say shit's gonna get moved, or whatever, until he figures out how to read the FAQ. I'm reading it, ... what IS the proper way to do so? Is it a matter of intent? He posts, we read, some of it is ok, most of it is shit. Just like everyone elses drivel. He keeps his link in his sig. If the word spam has taken a broader definition, and you're refering people to the FAQ, maybe it's time to update the FAQ.
quote:
First, there is NO pedophile porn posted, linked or traded here.
checkquote: Second, we will not tolerate the posting of true names and addresses without the permission of the person stated, or the posting of private logs and things of that sort if the other party objects.
checkquote: Third, we are not very fond of spammers or scrollers. Repeated postings of anything that is done just to fill a page or the forum index page is frowned upon and could be dealt with in a very unpleasant fashion.
checkquote:
Also, no public trading of warez or other like illegal software.
checkquote:
Basically, when it comes to rules, almost anything goes so long as the admins won't get put in prison.
checkquote: 6. Wanna see my cool-ass website?
We sure do, as long as you keep your link in your sig. It's like keeping your zipper up - we know you have a huge dick, just don't wave it in our faces, ok? Do note though that if it is your first time here and all you talk about is how cool your website is, action against you is likely to be taken.
Tal already touched on this, and there was some implication about intent. While I dont really like itty-bitty-bill, his posts are not about his website, they include content I believe may be from his website. His link is only in his sig. There's content in his posts. I've personally posted stuff here that I've posted and published elsewhere.
Whats the deal?
__________________
insert witty remark
Last edited by CHiPsJr on 11-09-2006 at 08:23 AM
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|