bunkum
Sanditon
Registered: Jul 2000
Location:
Posts: 4501 |
I think there are a lot of dangerous therapies suggested on that site -- but I also believe that a lot of cancer drugs can make someone worse, rather than better, or at least do little to improve the quality of life. The patient, in conjunction with the doctor, needs to make informed decisions about the course of treatment (or, if no treatment, the alleviation of symptoms, encouragement of good habits to support the body).
One of my colleagues has been battling cancer for a few years now, and just when the doctors think they've kicked it, it returns again. She's on round #3 now. Both chemo and radiation have been tried on her, and she's not only totally infertile now, but her bones are so weak that her wrist broke when she was hit with a ball, lightly thrown, at short range. The last time they did radiation, the therapist overdid it, and she can never receive that therapy again.
If she decides to do chemo this time, she has to wait until she gets really sick to do so. She's thinking of foregoing it, and trying something different. Whether she chooses treatment or not, I think her understanding is that she doesn't have just loads of time left, and that she wants to have those last few years be as high-quality as possible.
I understand people being frustrated by the treatments, by bad experiences, by poor-quality practitioners, but I also disagree with the whole "the doctors are trying to kill us with their drugs!" mentality that seems rife on that forum. Man, some of those folks are p-a-r-a-n-o-i-d. I recommend they stop watching the Sci-Fi channel, if they are that troubled.
__________________
"Good God! What kind of hallucinogen leaves you high enough to be blissfully unaware of a genital amputation but lucid enough to grease up a pan and cook up a wiener? "
--pervscan.com
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|