squee
the amen break
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 4700 |
You would expect the increase in overhead to push the sweet spot where "supply" and "demand" cross over to the right: goods will cost a little more, and people will be able to pay a little more, so very little will change.
However, if you look at it in absolute terms, three things are apparent. One, not everyone is at the minimum wage. A hike in the minimum wage doesn't mean that my salary, for instance, will increase. So now I have to pay more for the same products and I'm not making any more money. As with any event where something is affecting price, this becomes an opportunity for competition among vendors: Wal-Mart can take away some of Target's market share by losing some profits for a short time.
Second, whether or not your cost of goods goes up depends largely on how you participate in the economy. When oil prices go up, the cost of Chilean wine goes up because it costs money to ship it here. But, if I drink local wine, I don't end up paying more. I also support local business, which is important for other reasons.
Third, in general terms, as I said you would expect the "sweet spot" to get moved to the left or right depending on wages and prices. But this is not a linear relationship. For example, wages are just one of many costs a business faces, so if for example they had to pay NO wages, it's not as if price would fall dramatically (but since they would have fewer customers capable of buying goods, the business would probably fail). Likewise if employees were paid a million dollars a year, the business would fail. There is probably another "sweet spot" that balances wages and costs among other factors, which I think should be set organically by the market with some constraints, because if the market is completely free then a lot of people will get reduced to grinding poverty.
A lot of this is laid out in GK Chesterton's "Outline of Sanity" which I have just picked up. The market as it operates now is full of hypocrisy and waste--for example, the fact that Wal-Mart wants its employees poor and its customers wealthy, even though they are the same people--which could be adjusted if we employed a more distributivist approach (generally that means favoring small, local businesses).
__________________
What does polite society know of the secret hearts of men?
What shows the shuttered window but all the evil you can imagine?
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|