Private Messages Options Search Blogs Images Chat Cam Portals Calendar FAQ's Join  
Asylum Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.2.8 Asylum Forums > The Lost Forum > A math problem
Pages (3): [1] 2 3 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread [new thread]    [post reply]
MstrG
The Talamasca

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 10121

Post A math problem

The lone church in a small community was bursting at the seams, and needed expansion to accomodate the faithful. The elders enlisted the aid of an architectural firm to draw up plans, and consulted with a general contractor to develop an estimate for the project: $200,000. An edict was issued: mandatory tithing would be increased, and further, it would be based on one's ability to contribute.

A few families were destitute and contributed nothing.
Several others were able to provide a total of $20,000.
Two members, owners of the major businesses in town, kicked in for the remaining $180,000.

After several months, the elders had finally amassed the needed amount to begin the project. However, when they approached the bank, they were informed the estimate provided by the contractor was laden with errors. In fact, it was so far off, the bottom line for the project would now only be $160,000, $40,000 less than the original estimate.

The elders were pleased, and debated using the money to pay off some other creditors, but decided the right thing would be to return it to the congregation. The question is: how should they divide it up?

------------------
SETI@Home: join us!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 07:55 PM
MstrG is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MstrG Click here to Send MstrG a Private Message Visit MstrG's homepage! Find more posts by MstrG Add MstrG to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HELL
euphorbia's bad side

Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 3539

Post

Give it to God. Burn it as an offering to the almighty.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:00 PM
HELL is offline Click Here to See the Profile for HELL Click here to Send HELL a Private Message Find more posts by HELL Add HELL to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Jingle Jangles
Exodus 18:11

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: San Rafael
Posts: 520

Thumbs up

give 20,000 back to the families that contributed, spend the remaining 20,000 on creditors

------------------------
alpine reliant, police defiant, kentucky fried and popeyes #1 client

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:00 PM
Jingle Jangles is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Jingle Jangles Click here to Send Jingle Jangles a Private Message Visit Jingle Jangles's homepage! Find more posts by Jingle Jangles Add Jingle Jangles to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
slappy
slippery when happy

Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 3102

Post

IT'S MATHS GODDAMMIT! WITH AN "S" AT THE END!!!!!!!!!! hehe

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:03 PM
slappy is offline Click Here to See the Profile for slappy Click here to Send slappy a Private Message Find more posts by slappy Add slappy to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
wonderaz
Sarky Bastard

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Sedona, Arizona
Posts: 18823

Post

There is a trick to this, isn't there?

The 2 major contributors get $36,000 and the other contributors split the remaining $4,000

------------------------
Don't argue with me.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:03 PM
wonderaz is offline Click Here to See the Profile for wonderaz Click here to Send wonderaz a Private Message Visit wonderaz's homepage! Find more posts by wonderaz Add wonderaz to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MstrG
The Talamasca

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 10121

Post

quote:
Originally posted by wonderaz:
There is a trick to this, isn't there?



Indeed, there is.


slappy, you always make me smile.

------------------------
SETI@Home: join us!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:05 PM
MstrG is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MstrG Click here to Send MstrG a Private Message Visit MstrG's homepage! Find more posts by MstrG Add MstrG to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MadBomber
¤¬=(©)

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1353

Post

is this supposed to be an actual math problem? is there a correct answer? my answer is this:

inform the people/businesses who donated the good news. find out who donated and claimed a tax deduction. ask those people if they want any of the money back. Give a % of the monies back to the people who ask to have the money back and what ever is left over (from the folks that get a good tax cut or what ever) use to but the families who couldn't afford to contribute christmas dinners and such, or maybe buy some new bibles, or put the extra in the church slush for a parish picnic or something.


------------------------
¤¬=(©) .. boOM!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:06 PM
MadBomber is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MadBomber Click here to Send MadBomber a Private Message Visit MadBomber's homepage! Find more posts by MadBomber Add MadBomber to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
CAL
Damn Your Eyes!!

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Los Angeles, Ca
Posts: 2104

Cool

Split it between the two business owners.

But you probably knew I'd say that.

CAL

------------------------
"The desert is my church, and hunting is my god."

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:17 PM
CAL is offline Click Here to See the Profile for CAL Click here to Send CAL a Private Message Find more posts by CAL Add CAL to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HELL
euphorbia's bad side

Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 3539

Post

quote:
Originally posted by CAL:
Split it between the two business owners.

But you probably knew I'd say that.

CAL





Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:25 PM
HELL is offline Click Here to See the Profile for HELL Click here to Send HELL a Private Message Find more posts by HELL Add HELL to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Paint CHiPs
Viva Le Me

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Location Location
Posts: 26384

Post

quote:
Originally posted by wonderaz:

The 2 major contributors get $36,000 and the other contributors split the remaining $4,000




What he said.

The Christmas dinners and new bible thing sound all warm and fuzzy, but that isn't what the contributers thought they were paying for (or what they agreed to for that matter). The moral thing to do is to give back the money as Wonderaz said, and then either take up a new collection for the other stuff, or let the contributers do it on their own. They paid money for something, their money wasn't needed, they should get the money back. That simple.



[This message has been edited by Paint CHiPs (edited 12-18-2000).]

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:53 PM
Paint CHiPs is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Paint CHiPs Click here to Send Paint CHiPs a Private Message Visit Paint CHiPs's homepage! Find more posts by Paint CHiPs Add Paint CHiPs to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
wonderaz
Sarky Bastard

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Sedona, Arizona
Posts: 18823

Post

Yeah, fuck the trick shit. If they don't do it the way Paint and I figure it, we want the Church site URL.
We are raiding their fucking forum.

------------------------
Don't argue with me.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 08:59 PM
wonderaz is offline Click Here to See the Profile for wonderaz Click here to Send wonderaz a Private Message Visit wonderaz's homepage! Find more posts by wonderaz Add wonderaz to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
DevilMoon
passive stalker?

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: zanzibar
Posts: 10414

Post

I'd hold on to the money until the project was complete. When was the last time a contractor didn't run over budget? (of course when was the last time one announced that they had made a mistake that would save you $40k?).

Then I'd give the money back based on the % donated, unless the business owners wanted to fund the whole thing and get $20k back.

D

------------------------

There is no bunny I promise/It's ugly, it's stupid/Don't be the same

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 09:11 PM
DevilMoon is offline Click Here to See the Profile for DevilMoon Click here to Send DevilMoon a Private Message Find more posts by DevilMoon Add DevilMoon to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
J E B Stuart
Administrator

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Beyond Mason-Dixon Line
Posts: 16165

Post

Return $40,000 to the two members, owners of major businesses in town. Amen.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 09:14 PM
J E B Stuart is offline Click Here to See the Profile for J E B Stuart Click here to Send J E B Stuart a Private Message Visit J E B Stuart's homepage! Find more posts by J E B Stuart Add J E B Stuart to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
JoeyCat
Felis Dominatus

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Delaware
Posts: 5704

Post

quote:
Originally posted by J E B Stuart:
Return $40,000 to the two members, owners of major businesses in town. Amen.

NO!! Give the money to the people who couldn't afford to contribute.


------------------------
=^..^=

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 09:23 PM
JoeyCat is offline Click Here to See the Profile for JoeyCat Click here to Send JoeyCat a Private Message Find more posts by JoeyCat Add JoeyCat to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Jyates
BagOfUgly

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: texas
Posts: 661

Post

FUCK EM ALL!! GIVE THE MONEY TO ME!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-18-2000 09:30 PM
Jyates is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Jyates Click here to Send Jyates a Private Message Find more posts by Jyates Add Jyates to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MstrG
The Talamasca

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 10121

Wink

The US Government taxes its citizen's wages via statute established about 100 years ago. They currently operate under something called "The Income Tax Act of 1961". Here are some figures from 1997 (taken from taxfoundation.org):

The top 1% of wage earners pays over 1/3 of all Federal income tax.
The top 5% pay 53.8%.
The top 50% pay 95.8%.

So during the 1990s, the US experiences unprecedented economic growth, due to the steady leadership of the Federal Reserve and the conservative fiscal policies of the Congress, as well as the emergence of a strong technology sector. The US budget for years to come is projected to be overestimated by trillions of dollars.

A new president takes office in 2001, and sets some of that surplus aside to bolster sagging programs such as Medicare and Social Security, but believes the right thing to do is return most of it (about 1.3 trillion per year) to the citizens. The question is: how should he divide it up?

------------------------
SETI@Home: join us!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 12:05 AM
MstrG is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MstrG Click here to Send MstrG a Private Message Visit MstrG's homepage! Find more posts by MstrG Add MstrG to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HELL
euphorbia's bad side

Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 3539

Talking

DOE!!!!!



[This message has been edited by HELL (edited 12-18-2000).]

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 12:21 AM
HELL is offline Click Here to See the Profile for HELL Click here to Send HELL a Private Message Find more posts by HELL Add HELL to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HELL
euphorbia's bad side

Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 3539

Post

Nevermind, I guess thats clear. Good show G.

[This message has been edited by HELL (edited 12-18-2000).]

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 12:24 AM
HELL is offline Click Here to See the Profile for HELL Click here to Send HELL a Private Message Find more posts by HELL Add HELL to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
MadBomber
¤¬=(©)

Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1353

Post

quote:
Originally posted by MstrG:

A new president takes office in 2001, and sets some of that surplus aside to bolster sagging programs such as Medicare and Social Security, but believes the right thing to do is return most of it (about 1.3 trillion per year) to the citizens. The question is: how should he divide it up?




according to the 1998 census there's about 270 million people in the US. I could not find the percentage of that number which represents tax paying citizens .. but based of 270 million, every person would be entitled to about $3,700 per person. lets just say 1/2 the people pay taxes .. that would be $7,400 a year for a return .. then the sticky part would be splitting based on taxes paid .. I make more than the average (about 35k a year .. if you can believe that) so does this mean I get more $$ back? what about the tobacco companies that pay millions in taxes? how much do they get back? do teachers still get underpaid while big business gets a refund .. and if the answer is no, then do I get less to no money back? I worked hard to not be employed in the food service, so should I get more money back .. or should I get less because I can afford to buy new cars and houses. I would want my money (daddy needs a new bike) but at the same time I wouldn't want people who have more money than they need (me?) to get more back then the people who need it (me?) .. where to draw the line I wonder. it wouldn't be fair to say businesses get the same percentage back because then big business would take it all and leave nothing for the people .. however, there are smaller businesses that would deserve their whole share back.

this poses a good question MstrG .. sadly I think I already know the answers to these problems. I will not be getting a check for any amount from the government. at best I'll see a reduction in the already enormous amounts that I pay (I think I'm up to about 36-37% of my earnings to taxes now .. that's both state and federal and SS and all those other little slices of my pie) I would like to see my taxes reduced and the extra money they have now to be used on some of those public reform things the politicians always talk about but never seem to provide. hell, I would even feel less grumpy about the money I give now if some of that were actually done. I say feed some more kids, pay some more teachers, hire a few more cops and if we're lucky, this wealth we seem to have stumbled on would actually go a little further. if we educated people and provided safe places for them to live, they would be more productive and in turn make more money to ad to the pot.

but hey .. at least those bill boards will have fresh new cigarette ads next year.




------------------------
¤¬=(©) .. boOM!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 12:58 AM
MadBomber is offline Click Here to See the Profile for MadBomber Click here to Send MadBomber a Private Message Visit MadBomber's homepage! Find more posts by MadBomber Add MadBomber to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Paint CHiPs
Viva Le Me

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: Location Location
Posts: 26384

Post

quote:
Originally posted by MadBomber:
according to the 1998 census there's about 270 million people in the US. I could not find the percentage of that number which represents tax paying citizens .. but based of 270 million, every person would be entitled to about $3,700 per person. lets just say 1/2 the people pay taxes .. that would be $7,400 a year for a return .. then the sticky part would be splitting based on taxes paid .. I make more than the average (about 35k a year .. if you can believe that) so does this mean I get more $$ back? what about the tobacco companies that pay millions in taxes? how much do they get back? do teachers still get underpaid while big business gets a refund .. and if the answer is no, then do I get less to no money back? I worked hard to not be employed in the food service, so should I get more money back .. or should I get less because I can afford to buy new cars and houses. I would want my money (daddy needs a new bike) but at the same time I wouldn't want people who have more money than they need (me?) to get more back then the people who need it (me?) .. where to draw the line I wonder. it wouldn't be fair to say businesses get the same percentage back because then big business would take it all and leave nothing for the people .. however, there are smaller businesses that would deserve their whole share back.





No, I think you are missing the point. When it comes to church donations, everybody is all warm and cuddly with the notion of fairness. When it comes to taxes, the idea is "fuck them up the ass if we can!"

YES tobacco companies should get back their fair share. I don't give a shit if they are peddling death. IT IS THEIR MONEY! The government said "hey, we need all this money from you to do these things here..." the companies said "fine". The government then realized they did in fact NOT need all that money. Why on EARTH should they then redistribute that money to OTHER PEOPLE? Or invent other programs to pump the money into? I find it all the greater wrong that these companies and people would not be returned their money since it was practically forcibly taken from them, whereas at least in the church example the people chose of their own free will to give the money.

Should the federal government now play the role of Robin Hood?

Because if you are saying that the rich should get back less then their fair share of taxes, and instead it should be redistributed to the lower eschelon, you are saying, in essence, "these rich people should give ME their money!" What is right and fair about that? They already get taxed more then you, they get all of their bank accounts invested by the IRS, get fucked in the ass by the government on a regular basis, and then people suggest that when it comes time for the government to give people back some of the money they took from them that they don't need anymore, you are saying that YOU should get a greater share, even though you PAID less of a share? It's one thing to suggest that the wealthy should shoulder the burden of supporting the government more then the poor, it's another to say that the wealthy should shoulder the burder for everybody else.

Bomber, you make 35k a year and pay maybe 35% in taxes. Why is it more fair for a person making 35 million a year to have to pay 60%? And then for YOU to get back the lion's share of their money.

It constantly chafes me (yeah, that's right! I said CHAFES ME!) that people are so ready to bitch about how the wealthy should shoulder the burder for this society. Whatever happened to "All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten?" Why should the wealthy be punished for having succeeded? (and before anybody says it, the preschool value is "share" not "take from one kid against their will and give it to another kid". The latter is called "stealing" in the black and white logic of kindergarten).

I don't understand why EVERYBODY would not agree on this point.

And MadBomber said it himself. The REASON that the goverment needs to fuck that upper 10th percentile in the ass so hard is because the government fucking throws three fourths of it down the shitter. And yet instead of people shouting "the government needs to reform!" they shout "rich people should pay more!" Fuck that. That isn't right, no matter how you look at it.

But that's another issue I suppose.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 01:29 AM
Paint CHiPs is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Paint CHiPs Click here to Send Paint CHiPs a Private Message Visit Paint CHiPs's homepage! Find more posts by Paint CHiPs Add Paint CHiPs to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HELL
euphorbia's bad side

Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 3539

Post

amen-

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 01:34 AM
HELL is offline Click Here to See the Profile for HELL Click here to Send HELL a Private Message Find more posts by HELL Add HELL to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
HELL
euphorbia's bad side

Registered: Aug 2000
Location:
Posts: 3539

Post

Hey...who employs America and donates the majority of charity money?

I know.

oh ya, and doesnt use as many government programs as the rest of us?

[This message has been edited by HELL (edited 12-18-2000).]

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 01:37 AM
HELL is offline Click Here to See the Profile for HELL Click here to Send HELL a Private Message Find more posts by HELL Add HELL to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
morgana
THE Bitch

Registered: Jul 2000
Location: my mother's bloody womb
Posts: 7128

Post

quote:
Originally posted by MstrG:

The question is: how should they divide it up?




what joey said. the real answer is in the riddle: "A few families were destitute and contributed nothing."


that is, if they really practiced their belief.


Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 12-19-2000 02:01 AM
morgana is offline Click Here to See the Profile for morgana Click here to Send morgana a Private Message Visit morgana's homepage! Find more posts by morgana Add morgana to your buddy list [P] Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote