morgana
THE Bitch
Registered: Jul 2000
Location: my mother's bloody womb
Posts: 7148 |
quote: Originally posted by Nutrimentia:
Kids who are gay may be afraid or confused by it. They may not be able to approach their parents or friends (or pastor) for fear of reprisal, etc. I think society as a whole has made great strides in removing the barriers to self understanding and expression, but I can see where kids could still be confused.
and everything you've just said describes heterosexual anxiety as well. it's not that big of a deal, unless you start seperating it from "regular" sexuality by hosting special group sessions and counseling for it. then you make an issue out of it. before, there might have been some snide comments by some assholes about someone's rainbow necklace. now you've got some kid who was making a fucking joke suing the school board. i bet that whole school is divided right down the middle over this issue. now how right is that?
As for why it is in the schools, I would say that since kids spend as much time (or more) in school as they do with their parents, why not?
following that theory, schools should now start giving lessons in household chores. why not? how about the fact that this issue is heavily tied into some people's religious beliefs, i.e, it's AGAINST their parent's, and possibly their own, views. it is not the school's responsibility.
Many parents either don't realize tolerance should be taught, don't know how to approach the subject, or are intolerant themselves.
so, you're saying if someone is raised in a christian environment, and taught by their parents that homosexuality is bad, that it's the job of the schools to turn their views against their parents? what utter horseshit. you can ask emerald, i am not for christian beliefs at all, but i am still for the us constitution, which guarantees people the right to be free of religious persecution, which i think this fits nicely into.
I am not saying that I think that schools should take full responsibility for teaching and raising kids and parents' input isn't needed anymore, but I don't see how teaching wider social issues as secondary objectives can be a bad thing.
there is a huge difference between offering a sexuality anxiety counseling center available through the school, and posting huge pink triangles all over the school and proclaiming those areas "safe" zones for ONE particular group. so where's the safe area for girls who feel that they're sexually harassed by boys? where's the safe area for nerds and geeks who get bullied? there are far more pressing social issues (hello, GUNS) that should be addressed before the schools worry about which hole the boys are sticking their dicks in.
JEB, you summed up the uniform argument well. Kids are there to learn and having uniforms helps to level the field a little bit. You don't have problems like this and economics aren't as much an issue in who people are, at least in school. There are those that cry that uniforms take away inviduality, etc., but kids should be encouraged to express themselves in performance, not by materialistic display. You could also have a uniform system that gives a few options of uniform styles, any of which are acceptable.
i am not going to be dissuaded from the original argument. if you choose to take up this at a later date i would be happy to prove you wrong.
[/B]
------------------------
Not everything is love, and not everything in this place is either forgiven or forgotten. - redguard@blackvault.com
Report this post to a moderator |
IP: Logged
|